New Study Suggests That Divorced Dads Can Help Keep Their Kids From Smoking
by Jon Henshaw
Ball State study finds that divorced dads can stop children from smoking New Study Suggests That Divorced Dads Can Help Keep Their Children From SmokingThe Centers for Disease Control estimates that about 1 million teens — about 1 in 5 — become smokers every year but a Ball State professor has found that in the case of broken homes, nonresidential fathers can play a major role in stemming this unhealthy habit.

Chad Menning
Sociology professor Chad Menning found divorced or separated nonresidential fathers can significantly reduce their adolescent children’s chances of smoking by being a strong role model and spending more time with them.
The study found that when teens are with their fathers five times a month, including overnight stays, they experience a 30-percent reduction in the probability of starting to smoke regularly. When teens spend little or no time with their nonresident fathers, the chances of their smoking increases by 40 percent.
The study also found when nonresident fathers fail to provide support and develop a solid relationship with their sons and daughters, teens turn to their friends for advice and guidance. Teens with friends who smoked were more likely to start smoking regularly.
Menning has spent the last several years studying the impact of divorce on American families. In 2004, he found that adolescents learn to manipulate their parents following a divorce or separation, gaining more control of their situation in a two-household family.
Below is contact information for Dr. Menning and background on the study.
Background
A new Ball State University study finds that divorced or separated fathers can significantly reduce their adolescent children’s chances of smoking by being a strong role model and spending more time with them.
The findings are from a study examining the long-term impact of relationships between nonresident separated or divorced fathers and their offspring, which involved 1,932 participants from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health.
“Smoking is less likely if nonresident fathers spend ‘quality’ time with their children,” said Chad Menning, a sociology professor who conducted the study. “These fathers are more likely to influence their children about lifestyle habits.”
The study found that when teens are with their fathers five times a month, including overnight stays, they experience a 30-percent reduction in the probability of starting to smoke regularly. When teens spend little or no time with their nonresident fathers, the chances increase by 40 percent.
The quality of those visits also has a major impact, Menning said.
“However, we found it isn’t so much the number of times a teen spends with his or her dad, but the quality of the relationship,” he said. “This means a father must play a parental role, working on homework with their sons and daughters, or taking them to plays, museums or events. If a child feels close to his or her father, the parental influence increases tremendously when it comes to smoking.”
The study also found when nonresident fathers fail to provide support and develop a solid relationship with their sons and daughters, teens turn to their friends for advice and guidance. Teens with friends who smoked were more likely to start smoking regularly.
“This study strongly supports the notion that nonresident fathers must be involved with their children on a regular basis,” Menning said. “We’ve addressed the financial support through the courts and legislation, but divorced fathers who are involved can play a major role in helping adolescents grow into healthy adults.”
Contact Menning at clmenning@bsu.edu or (765) 285-4690.
This entry was posted on Wednesday, June 7th, 2006 at 9:39 am and is filed under Alcohol and Other Drugs, Divorce and Separation, Parenting. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.


























April 2nd, 2008 at 3:28 am
This is a fairly interesting article about one single fascet of a multifasceted issue. The premis seems to be that a divorced non-resident father can have a significant impact on the self esteem and overall wellbeing for their children who are now being raised by a single parent specifically the mother. Naturally this is true, kind of a no-brainer if a non-resident father spends a lot of high quality time with his children, those children gain more perspective on life as a whole.
Question: How much of the time NOT spent with the children, or NOT considered quality was because of the teenager in question? You admit in the article that children of divorced parents quickly learn they can manipulate their parents against eachother in multiple household families. What about when the FATHER does not allow the manipulation, and in typical teen fashion the teen denounces the fathers right to parent completely even refusing to communicate at all?